As
the moment of judgment neared, they barely slept, convinced that their
very futures were on the line. Dread consumed them. Panic overwhelmed
them.
I don’t mean Americans awaiting the Electoral College’s validation of Donald Trump.
I mean students (and their parents) awaiting actual colleges’ verdicts on early-decision and early-action applications.
One
friend of mine canceled our dinner plan because he hadn’t realized that
it fell around the time when his daughter expected word from her top Ivy League choice. He and his wife couldn’t leave her home alone in such a tremulous state, at such a terrifying juncture.
Another
friend’s daughter, also vying to get into a highly selective school,
repeatedly burst into tears as she berated herself for a 3.9 grade point
average instead of a 4.0. What if the difference spelled her doom?
As I’ve written before,
the college admissions process has become a dignity-ravaging frenzy,
illustrated by the plot of a recent episode of the TV drama “Law &
Order: Special Victims Unit.” It asked whether a man assuming a fake
identity to seduce women could be prosecuted for rape.
What
identity do you suppose he chose as the most potent and irresistible?
Not a Hollywood director who could make the women stars. Not a Wall
Street titan who could drape them in jewels. He impersonated a dean of
admissions who could give their kids slots at an elite university. And
one after another, these helicopter moms whirled into the boudoir.
Early
decision and early action, which are offered by some 450 colleges, are a
special and especially disturbing part of the frenzy. They refer to a
process by which, broadly speaking, a student applies in November to
just one, most-desired school, which answers in December. If the school
practices early decision and says yes, the student is obliged to go.
Early action isn’t binding.
At least since 2001, when The Atlantic published a definitive article by James Fallows titled “The Early-Decision Racket,” there’s been fervent discussion of the downsides of the process. But it’s more prevalent than ever, with some selective schools using it to fill upward of 40 percent of their incoming freshman class.